The “Hunger Games” of Manufacturing Development

April 26th, 2012

Laws of Physics vs. the Regulations of the FCC

by Steve Richardson

Last week I finished reading the “Hunger Games” trilogy and went to see the first film. I’ve got to tell you,  when I saw the room-sized holographic game board with the frightening figments of the Game Makers’ imaginations being instantly translated into four-legged, mutt-monsters in a live arena, the leap in my ‘willing suspension of disbelief’ caused me to stop and reflect. What diverse and unanticipated technical developments have already occurred to put us where we are now, and how every day we strive to hone the current state of our designs and manufacturing processes? All this has resulted in a new plateau of capabilities, either replacing or augmenting previous, hard-fought accomplishments.

Enter a very smart customer design engineer, with a very explicit Front Panel concept and a very aggressive target price and rollout schedule.  One can already sense the creative juices flowing in our own engineering and manufacturing groups.  Simply stated, the problem is:

  • Maximizing the ventilation potential of an extruded front panel
  • Preserving the stiffness and providing mounting for a variable set of I/O configurations
  • Ensuring regulatory FCC emissions compliance.

The wheels turned, the whiteboards filled with concept after concept, a myriad of possible options.  One solution imbedded a stainless steel panel with machined I/O and venting honeycomb into an extruded aluminum frame. This approach would accommodate multiple I/O configurations for a family of front panels, while passing on the economies of scale by using identical frames and support hardware for all panels.

Another approach would entail creating the entire front panel in an automated, high-speed turret punch and forming operation. This process could be accomplished in a wide variety of sheet metal material thicknesses. Although most of the tooling for the process is already part of the company’s library, custom punch and forming tools are always available.  Advantages associated with this construction are the dimensional repeatability inherent in a single set-up, rapid cycle times, and the requirement for only one finish plating process.

Laser cut, water jetted, and photo etched front panels fall into a category of processes employed typically for prototyping and lower volumes, except in those cases where very small features (on the order of a few thousandths) are required.  These processes are making considerable inroads in the micro-manufacturing arena as well as extending the prototyping process into startup production.  They can often act as bridge strategies until field testing is validated and/or financial milestones are met.

All additive and subtractive material processes, after all, fall into what I like to refer to as the ‘enabling’ category of manufacturing. However, it is the rigor of generating process maps, dissecting the current condition, identifying the waste, learning from quality analyses, applying the body of knowledge, etc to future process development that produces the rewards. It is that relentless application of LEAN techniques that will result in carving out the best solution set for our customers.

Honeycomb_Front_Panel

The final product satisfying all 3 requirements from the customer.

Having spent years finessing the machining processes within the Massachusetts facility, maximizing spindle utilization, designing quick change fixtures, again, using LEAN tools for set-up and inspection – the process was elevated to a new level altogether by utilizing a somewhat conventional machining center with high spindle speeds, hyper-cooled miniature cutters, and novel fixtures, while optimizing the process with efficient tool paths, cutting speeds, and feed rates. This is not a particularly unusual story within the CBT family. The methodologies to create winning solutions to customer problems, as laid out in this brief piece, are inherent in the CBT DNA.

Katniss Everdeen, from The Hunger Games

Katniss Everdeen, the heroine in the “Hunger Games” has a talent for one thing that she does pretty well, archery. That turns out to be her winning strength, but the mastering of other survival techniques, eagerly learned from competitors and mentors during her training, prepared her well for the unexpected.  So too, at CBT Technology, we have things that we are the best at, but we always keep the armory fresh with the other weapons of successful commerce.  We are consistently prepared to encounter those technically freakish obstacles for which alternative strategies are the answer.

CBT will help create the “winning solution” for your demanding application.  Call us.

 

 

One Company’s Method to Beat the Manufacturing Skills Gap

April 9th, 2012

The manufacturing skills gap is a two-pronged issue that is often talked about as if there is a silver bullet.  While economists and consultants may talk about national averages and use aggregate data, CBT’s Human Resources team wanted to share our own experiences in New England and the methods we have used to handle the skills gap (yes, there is one here!) on two very distinct fronts: entry-level and skilled positions.

Current Shortage

from the Manufacturing Institute

Entry level positions are usually low to semi-skilled jobs in departments led by skilled supervisors.  After a standard orientation period during which the new employee trains in their department, they are expected to be effective and productive employees.

This is the level at which Human Resources and management discovers which employees are exhibiting they just want a ‘job’ or really want a ‘career.’  Employees on the career path are identified as potential candidates for cross-training, leadership roles, and promotion.

For positions in machining, we need workers with some prior experience with our type of equipment and products.  Since manufacturing has a historically low turnover rate sourcing skilled machinists is not always a viable option.  Rather we work both internally and externally to cultivate the skills we need in individuals who stand out and show the desire to learn about manufacturing as a career.

From within, we count on our supervisors to take advantage of ‘career track’ employees who show their desire to learn more.  These motivated employees are frequently offered the opportunity to learn new skills (expert to shadow, material and projects to practice on) and as opportunities open up in other departments, the cross-trained employees are the first choice candidates for those positions.  One example in recent years was a 2nd shift CNC operator who learned CNC setup, advanced to lead, switched to 1st shift, and now works as a Process Engineer running the NPI/prototype program for our global network of factories.

The second way in which we hire people with machining experience is to partner with local vocational schools.  As the stigma of manufacturing has grown, schools have done away with shop classes or turned them into service-related career courses.  By participating in the co-op program with a near-by school, Bristol-Plymouth Regional Technical School, we are able to encourage schools and parents that machining classes are worthwhile and can lead to fulfilling careers.  Our supervisors train co-op students to use our own machinery and will offer full-time positions to exemplary performers.  Just last November, we hosted a lunch and factory tour for a group of Bristol co-op students including CAD-CAM student Paul McQuinn who explained the benefits he sees in working with CBT Technology in the Taunton Gazette article: Building a Career.

Many industries and regions have cited skill gaps as a major hindrance to growth and innovation initiatives.  At CBT Technology, we still rely on the vocational system for entry-level machinists but also on our own internal resources to further develop these employees into the future champions our company needs to succeed. While this approach requires much more long-term thinking by management and Human Resources, we believe it is the best way for us to be competitive and flexible in the current business environment.

Patent on uTCA “No-Load” Fastener

March 1st, 2012

CBT has just been awarded a patent for our “Threaded Fastener” design. You may wonder why CBT Technology, a company focused on front panel and enclosure solutions has a patent on a fastener, but it’s not that far of a stretch really.

As our company has grown and diversified over the years, we pride ourselves on being able to support many different types of components from modalities such as injection molding and die casting, along with our core competencies of aluminum extruding and sheet metal fabrication.

We are always interested in providing unique solutions for our customers, regardless of the path this takes us down. In this case, we became aware of the need for a special fastener while serving on the committee for the MicroTCA.1 Air Cooled Rugged Specification a few years ago. Required was a retention device with the ability to fasten a front panel to a subrack without producing excessive force toward the backplane, as this could cause undue stress on the connectors. To satisfy this need, we developed our “No-Load” fastener. This fastener actually neutralizes the screw driving force, yet fastens front panel to the nut bar.

Since the release of the MicroTCA.1 specification, the MicroTCA.4 spec has also adopted the requirement for this retention device.

While not the first fastener we have designed for our products or customers, this design was unique enough to merit a patent, #US 8,066,461 B2.

Please contact us for additional information: sales@cbttechnology.com

See the fastener in action: